How does the reasonable patient standard assess negligence?

The reasonable patient standard assesses negligence by evaluating the care a reasonable person would expect under similar circumstances. This standard shifts the focus from the actions of healthcare providers to the expectations of patients regarding their care. In applying this standard, the court seeks to determine whether a typical patient, possessing average knowledge about medical procedures and risks, would have understood the necessary information to make an informed decision about their treatment.

This standard is particularly significant in cases involving informed consent, where a healthcare provider must disclose risks, benefits, and alternatives to a procedure or treatment. By using the reasonable patient standard, courts aim to ensure that patients receive the level of information and care that aligns with societal norms and expectations, ultimately protecting patient rights and promoting accountability in healthcare practices.