A release of information (ROI) authorization signed and dated by the patient is considered invalid when it _____.

A release of information (ROI) authorization signed and dated by the patient must include a specific description of the information requested to be considered valid. This requirement ensures that the patient fully understands what information is being disclosed and to whom. It provides clarity and specificity, which are essential for informed consent. When the authorization lacks a clear and detailed description of the information, it does not meet the legal and ethical standards necessary for the release to be valid. This ensures that patients are adequately informed about their personal health information and can make informed decisions regarding its disclosure.

In contrast, the other factors might influence the perception of the authorization's validity but do not hold the same weight in legal requirements as specificity in the description of the information. For example, being signed in pencil might raise concerns about authenticity but does not fundamentally invalidate the authorization; similarly, vague language or lack of witnessing can be problematic but fail to address the core issue of ensuring that the patient is fully informed about what information is being released.